Buddy

NAVIGATING STRUCTURAL & SYSTEMIC INEQUITIES...

Empowering students with disabilities one step at a time.
Buddy-Mockup-5

DURATION

Sep 2023 - Mar 2024

TEAM

Isha Tamrakar

TOOLS

User Research, Affinity Mapping, Visual Design, Prototyping, AB testing

INTRODUCTION
01

Students with disabilities face significant challenges when navigating existing structural and systemic inequities on college campuses. The lack of accessibility creates obstacles that impact their daily lives and college experiences. Issues such as inaccessible infrastructure, limited signage, transportation difficulties, and communication challenges can add up. This affects their ability to learn and perform, adding an extra layer of difficulty to an already challenging societal environment. 

Eduardo-1

TARGET AUDIENCE

Defining the Affected Groups

They have the same goals as every student:

→ attend classes on time

→ participate in on-campus events

→ study to pursue their careers

Recognizing Pain Points

I conducted 13 interviews to gather insights into the experiences of individuals at UC Davis and understand how the university impacted their education. Through these interviews, my audience shared specific examples of accessibility challenges that have been overlooked. I highlighted the main pain points to empathize with their experience and identify obstacles hindering students from achieving their goals.

Illustration-Business-Startup-Growth-success-_-build-idea-innovation-man-thought-grow-smart

Unforeseen Circumstances

Lack of accessibility in buildings and infrastructure, including elevator and bus ramp issues, makes getting to classes more challenging for students.

Illustration-support-technology-error-_-deadline-stress-man-customer-service

Preplanning Routes

Exploring the best possible route on campus becomes a premeditated task, often leading to dead ends and frustrating obstacles.

Illustration-Transportation-Outdoor-Sport-_-bike-bicycle-woman-happy-activity-race

Busy Campus Life

Busy campus poses threats to their safety, with every person, bike, and car potentially becoming a hazard.

Every student deserves the freedom to navigate the campus without obstacles affecting their education and access to resources.

How might we design tools to enhance campus accessibility for students with disabilities, fostering inclusivity and support at UC Davis?

RESEARCH
03

INTERVIEWS

Collecting Firsthand Accounts

I began my research by interviewing 13 students with disabilities to gather insights into their navigation challenges, providing firsthand perspectives on campus usability and accessibility. The interviews provided valuable qualitative data, helping me understand the students' experiences and preferences, and served as a foundation for grasping user context and empathy. I structured my interview questions as follows:

Untitled-940-x-400-px-2

USER JOURNEY MAP

Mapping the Student Journey: Navigating to Class with Physical Disabilities

After the interviews, I organized the feedback into a user journey map to highlight the various stages and emotions experienced by a student with physical disabilities traveling to a class on campus from their apartment. This map emphasizes potential challenges, accommodations, and strategies needed to navigate their journey successfully.

Obstacles-Interaction-Points

COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS

A Comparision of Different Techniques

Next, I aimed to understand various accessibility approaches in existing popular navigation applications. Through conducting a competitive analysis, I was able to study best practices, innovative features, and potential gaps in these accessibility solutions. This analysis helped inform my app development process.

Competitive-Analysis
CONCEPT CREATION
03

LOW FIDELITY SKETCHES

Drafting a Potential Solution

Now that I had a grasp on the problem at hand and its effect on students, I began to draft potential ideas for my application. Additionally, I explored how to incorporate accessibility design considerations into my sketches. With these wireframes, I was able to visualize my ideas and realize essential features & make necessary improvements. 

lowfi1

Task 1

lowfi2

When developing my wireframes, I noted down several questions I wanted to explore as I continued to develop my design. 

  • How can I add more specifications about the location of a report? Example: The elevator button is broken on the MU's second floor on the building's right side.
  • How would a route change if you had a friend or caretaker with you? Example: You have help opening doors but still need to use the elevator.
  • How can I specify which classroom or room in the building to route to?

WIRE FLOWS

Improving Accessibility Flow in Application Development

Upon gaining clarity on the framework of my application I drafted my Mid-Fi screens and created wire flows to organize tasks. I decided which features could be grouped into which tabs to optimize the flow of one screen to the next. The following diagram illustrates the set of steps it would take the user to adjust their accessibility preferences & report a barrier. Now, that I had an understanding of the essential screens for our application, I was ready to move on.

unnamed

USABILITY TESTING

Conducting Usability Tests for Prototype Validation

I decided to conduct a usability test to ensure my prototype was following my goal of enhancing accessibility for students with disabilities. I asked users to perform a series of tasks on the prototype and explain their thought processes along the way. I also got general feedback on our choice of words, icons, clickability of buttons, sizing of icons, and overall design.  

Tester Profile: 5 students attending UC Davis, ages ranging from 19 to 23

  • Task 1: Adjust the route accessibility preferences based on your needs.
  • Task 2: Report a broken elevator in the Memorial Union. Specify which elevator is broken.
  • Task 3: Start a downloaded route navigation to Target.
logreport

BUTTON = distracting, redundant

Users stated that they weren’t sure if clicking the report button meant they had to fill out the form right away or if it created a draft. 

Consider:
How do we make this less overwhelming?

saved-routes

"Are the saved routes from any location?" 

"What's the difference between saved routes and favorites?"

Consider: 

Clarify start & end locations for saved routes
Indicate that Favorites are saved places
Change 'Save' to Download or Offline

ACCESSIBILITY ITERATIONS

Enhancing Mobile App Frameworks for Inclusive Design

After usability tests, I decided to redesign the accessibility and navigation page, focusing on areas that needed improvement. This process helped me identify essential elements for a strong mobile app framework. I was able to explore different solutions to improve accessibility and usability, tackling specific challenges revealed in the testing. This experience not only enhanced my design skills but also deepened my understanding of creating inclusive and user-friendly interfaces. By offering additional functions and customization options for accessibility routes, individuals can optimize their travels and avoid complications using this app.

Accessibility-Iterations
FINAL DESIGN
04
Buddy-GIF

Scan QR Code for Easy Access to Classroom Routes

→ Connect QR codes featured on flyers or emails to assist with wayfinding instructions.

→ Ensures students have access to clear and concise directions in various formats (text, audio, visual) for any classroom, even if it's difficult to locate.

addstopgif

Enhanced Navigation: Including Essential Stops and Personalized Route Modifications

→ Modify the route according to the presence of a companion or caregiver.

→ Identifying bathrooms and designated accessible parking spaces helps alleviate the stress of locating them, particularly in busy or unfamiliar locations.

IMPACT

RESEARCH - I didn’t have much prior knowledge about the accessibility issues on campus, but learning about the power of research and digging deep into the problem space helped me develop a more comprehensive solution. In the future, I want to build a diverse team that includes people with disabilities, involving them in the design process to truly capture their experiences.

ACCESSIBILITY - Designing for accessibility is a complex endeavor. As someone who couldn't personally relate to the experience, I found myself heavily relying on interviews and additional research to adequately design for accessibility. It was challenging to step into the users' shoes, foresee potential obstacles, and create solutions through an application. Ultimately, it made me more empathetic and aware.

Hi there! I would love to connect >.<

Find me on LinkedIn. Chat with me at [email protected].